For example, I spent the better part of four days working on the Master Application List Letter to Application Owners. This is the letter that we are going to send out to the members of the department (and others) that own the applications that we will be analyzing and collecting data on.
After the time that I spent alone on the letter, I met with one of my mentors, Garrett Treager, and we spent over an hour analyzing all of the wording in every sentence as well as the organization of the letter. We decided that, knowing that our audience wouldn’t respond well to a huge block of text, we wanted to simplify it into bullet points, headings, and charts so that they had the capability of selectively reading, but also provided all of the information that they needed. As I’ve discussed in my last post, this is a very fine line to walk, and one that may never be fully perfected without the help of coworkers and another set of eyes.
We sent this letter to Mary Gallagher for review to see if we were able to send it out to the proper recipients yet. We just got the letter back with several edits that both Garrett and I didn’t necessarily think of. For example, here are a few changes from our document:
- set up a meeting -->
schedule a meeting - so that we can discuss this information -->
so that we can discuss your application information with you - make sure -->
verify - When we do meet, the data that we will need about each of your applications include: -->
During our meeting, please be prepared to discuss the following information needed for your documented applications: - aren’t -->
are not
Even though Garrett and I spent over an hour editing this page-and-a-half document together, literally going through every word, Mary was still able to find wording that could be improved upon. Not only is this another way that can help both myself and Garrett prove on our document-writing ability, but it also shows me (us) that another set of eyes is always welcome on any document that one may be producing.
